论文部分内容阅读
目的:为了研究氨茶碱与多索茶碱在治疗支气管哮喘的临床疗效。方法:通过分析近三年内于晋州市人民医院经过的治疗的60例支气管哮喘患者的病情,依据不同的药品把所有的患者分成氨茶碱组和多索茶碱组(n=30),分别进行氨茶碱和多索茶碱诊治,之后看2组患者12h、24h、36h的治疗效果。结果:多索茶碱组患者与氨茶碱组患者相比,FEVl/FVC变的更好,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);12h、24h以及36h的临床总有效率都比氨茶碱组高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);还有12h、24h和36h发生的不好的效果也在减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:通过多索茶碱组患者与氨茶碱组患者相比,多索茶碱治疗效果比氨茶碱组的治理效果好,也会减少不良反应的发生;氨茶碱治疗效果总的来说还是可以的,但是不良反应的发生率较高,在治疗过程中要根据病人的发病情况来确定最佳的治疗办法。
Objective: To study the clinical efficacy of aminophylline and doxofylline in the treatment of bronchial asthma. Methods: Sixty patients with bronchial asthma undergoing treatment in Jinzhou People’s Hospital in the past three years were analyzed. All patients were divided into aminophylline group and doxofylline group according to different drugs (n = 30) Respectively, aminophylline and doxofylline diagnosis and treatment, and then see two groups of patients 12h, 24h, 36h treatment. Results: Compared with patients in aminophylline group, the FEVl / FVC was significantly improved in the doxofylline group (P <0.05), and the total effective rate in 12 hours, 24 hours and 36 hours was higher than that in aminophylline group The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The adverse effect of 12 h, 24 h and 36 h was also decreased, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Doxofylline is more effective than aminophylline in treating ADHD patients and may reduce the incidence of adverse reactions compared with patients in the aminophylline group. The overall effect of aminophylline treatment Said yes or so, but the incidence of adverse reactions higher in the course of treatment according to the patient’s condition to determine the best treatment.