论文部分内容阅读
清代学者黄奭在古史的辑佚方面成绩卓著,但其编年体晋史——王韶之《晋安帝纪》辑本却误将《续晋安帝纪》佚文收录在内。经笔者考定,二书非出自一人之手:《晋安帝纪》的作者为晋宋之际的王韶之,而《续晋安帝纪》的作者为刘宋人周伭。二书名称不同,黄氏缘何将其视为一书?首先是因为《晋安帝纪》的别名过多;其次,《晋安帝纪》与《续晋安帝纪》的引文几全不题撰者姓名;再次,二书同为安帝朝史书,在时间跨度上有重复部分;最后,《续晋安帝纪》一书,诸正史皆未有著录。上述原因使得黄奭以为《续晋安帝纪》乃《晋安帝纪》之别名,亦当出自王韶之之手,以致酿成辑佚之误。
Huang Qing, a scholar of the Qing Dynasty, had achieved outstanding results in the collection of ancient history, but his chronicles of the history of the Jin Dynasty, Wang Shaozhi’s “Annals of Jinan”, was mistakenly listed in the Lost Text of “Continuing Emperor An Di Ji”. The author test, the second book is not from the hand of one: “Jinan Emperor” is the author of the occasion of the Jin and Song Wang Shaozhi, and “continued Jin Andi Ji,” the author of Liu Song Zhou Yong. Second, the name of the book is different, why Huang treats it as a book? First of all, because of the “Jin Andi Ji” too many aliases; secondly, “Jin Andi Ji” and “Continued Anji Ji” ; Again, the two books are the same as the history of the Andean dynasty book, in the span of time there is a repetition of part; finally, “continued Jin Andi Ji” one book, all records are not recorded. The above reasons make Huangpi think “continued Jin Andi Ji” is “Jin Andi Ji” of the alias, but also when the hand from Wang Shaozhi, resulting in a series of errors.