基于当事人主义优于职权主义以及由当事人掌握取证权更易查清事实真相这样的认识,台湾于2002年通过对“刑事诉讼法”第163条的修改将其诉讼模式转变为“改良式当事人主义”。但其实刑事诉讼的目的并不在于查清事实真相,而在于解决纠纷。审判所需要查清的事实真相程度,必须用“当事人主义标尺”和各方真诚的努力这两个因素加以衡量。因而由法院及当事人共同分担取证权则好于任何一方对此的独占。 Based on the understanding that party doctrine is superior to authority and that the parties can more easily ascertain the truth about the right to obtain evidence, Taiwan passed its revision of Article 163 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in 2002 to “ Litigant ”. But in fact the purpose of criminal proceedings is not to find out the truth, but rather to resolve disputes. The degree of truth that needs to be ascertained in the trial must be measured by two factors: the “rule of party rule” and the sincere efforts of all parties. Therefore, the court and the parties to share the right to obtain evidence is better than either party’s exclusive.