论文部分内容阅读
在关于胡适、鲁迅的评价争论中,仍然还有人提及鲁迅批胡适的《王道诗话》一文及文中的四首诗。现在大家都知道这文章及四首诗实际上是瞿秋白作的,鲁迅只是在1933年3月6日用了自己的笔名在上海《申报·自由谈》将其公开发表。五六十年代的一些选本及教科书就开始点明是鲁迅的作品,分析讲解时也与鲁迅文章诗歌的名篇合并一处评价,特别是“文化大革命”中讲解人更不提及瞿秋白,《王道诗话》便成了鲁迅批胡适的著名篇章了。其实,细细寻绎鲁迅的论战史与论辩思维,或者更细一点检索一下鲁迅的杂文发生线索与创作习惯,鲁迅是不会撰写《王道诗话》(也包括《出卖灵魂的秘诀》的)。——这一类高调批胡适的作品正是瞿秋白晚期很热衷的一个话题,张满了瞿秋白杂文的风格。
In the controversy over the evaluation of Hu Shih and Lu Xun, there are still some people who mentioned Lu Shi’s approval of Hu Shih’s “Wang Tao Shi Hua” and his four poems. Now that we all know that this article and the four poems are in fact made by Qu Qiubai, Lu Xun published it publicly only in Shanghai on March 6, 1933 under the pseudonym of “declaration and freedom talks.” In the 1950s and 1960s, some of the selected texts and textbooks began to make clear that they were works by Lu Xun. When analyzing and explaining, they also combined with the famous articles of Lu Xun’s essays and poems. In particular, the article entitled “Cultural Revolution” did not mention Qu Qiubai, “Wang Tao Shi Hua” became the famous chapter of Lu Xun Hu Shi. In fact, the careful examination of Lu Xun’s debate on the history and debate thinking, or a little more detailed search of Lu Xun’s clues and clues to create clues, Lu Xun will not write “Wang Tao Shi Hua” (also includes “the secret of betrayal of the soul”). - This type of high-profile works of Hu Shi is Qu Qiubai late one very keen topic, full of Qu Qiubai essay style.