论文部分内容阅读
针对中国队与韩国队、伊朗队和中华台北队失利比赛中进攻技战术运用的问题,寻找与对手之间存在的差距;采用文献资料法、专家访谈法、录像观察法和统计分析法,技术、战术运用情况进行分析讨论;结论 :1)中国队的各项技术统计数据均落后于对手,在亚洲区域内的内线不再有明显优势,投篮命中率较低,篮板球能力降低;2)在进攻次数和进攻时间占优势的情况下,由于转换成得分机会的能力较低,不能形成胜势;3)中国队与韩国队比赛中,韩国队较中国队在中距离投篮的命中率更高;中国队与伊朗队比赛中,伊朗队较中国队篮下和个人突破后投篮使用的次数和命中率更高;中国队与中华台北队比赛中,中华台北队较中国队突破和三分球投篮命中率更高;4)韩国、伊朗和中华台北3支队伍主要得分队员在快速运球突破、突破分球、快速转移球强攻、篮下投篮得分、中远距离投篮得分几种得分方式的运用上较中国队更为普遍和经常,而且效果明显;5)韩国、伊朗和中华台北3支队伍在快攻和阵地进攻上的使用更为高效,成功率较中国队高,攻守转换的能力和意识较强。
For the Chinese team and the South Korean team, the Iranian team and the Chinese Taipei defeat game in the use of offensive and tactical skills to find the gap with the opponent; the use of documentation, expert interview, video observation and statistical analysis, technology , Tactical use of the situation analysis and discussion; Conclusion: 1) The Chinese team’s technical statistics are behind the opponent in the Asian region no longer have a clear advantage inside, shooting low, reduced ability to rebound; 2) In the case of offensive times and offensive time advantage, due to the ability to convert into scoring opportunities lower, can not form a winning streak; 3) China and South Korea team game, the Chinese team in the distance than the Chinese team shooting more High; the Chinese team and the Iranian team competition, the Iranian team than the Chinese team after the basket and personal breakthrough shot use and the hit rate higher; Chinese team and Chinese Taipei team competition, Chinese Taipei team more than the Chinese team breakthrough and one-third Ball shooting higher; 4) South Korea, Iran and Chinese Taipei, the three major team scorers in the rapid dribble break, break the ball, fast transfer storm, the basket shooting score, the distance 5) South Korea, Iran and Chinese Taipei 3 teams in the fast break and positional offense on the use of more efficient, the success rate of more than the use of the Chinese team score more common and regular, and the effect is obvious; Chinese team high, offensive and defensive conversion ability and awareness.