论文部分内容阅读
“满洲殖民主义”作为新清史的主要理论来源之一,是濮德培等人将西方帝国主义理论运用到清朝历史解释上的一个结果,他们认为清朝作为一个帝国,于17—18世纪在内亚地区进行了殖民扩张,与同时代的欧洲列强、奥斯曼土耳其等存在相似性。这种观点建立在西方殖民主义理论研究的基础之上,在史实和逻辑上都存在着严重缺陷,有着强烈的意识形态色彩。我们在批判满洲殖民主义的同时,更应该注重回到国家构建的视角和路径,纠正我们以往研究中的思维误区,推进对清朝政治史的整体性、历时性研究。
As one of the main theoretical sources of the New Qing History, Manchurian colonialism was one of the results of Pu Tepei’s application of Western imperialist theories to the historical explanation of the Qing Dynasty. They considered the Qing Dynasty as an empire in the 17th and 18th centuries The sub-region underwent colonial expansion with similarities with contemporary European powers and Ottoman Turkey. This view is based on the study of the theories of Western colonialism. It has serious flaws in historical facts and logic and has a strong ideological color. While criticizing Manchurian colonialism, we should pay more attention to returning to the perspective and path of state construction, correcting the misunderstandings in our past studies and advancing the holistic and diachronic studies of the political history of the Qing Dynasty.