顾城客死激流岛,国内曾哗然一时,然而仅限于小报上生活细节的叙述,此后便了无声息。理论家不置一词:仿佛事已如此,何须再说。刘震环先生也只是说:“让人无法悼念”,(《英儿》编后)或许,人们就是这种心理,不愿再说。不过,我们认为顾城现象是一种存在,应本着实事求是的精神对他进行研究。一个年轻人,冲上诗坛,转而从国内跑到国外求发展,结果,好比一股刚刚露出地面的汩汩清泉很快消逝了。这诗泉是怎样消逝的呢?倘能从作品及创作思想研究一下,这对文学界是有益的,对于年轻的文学工作者尤有裨益。 Gu Cheng off dead island, the country had an uproar for a while, but limited to tabloids on the details of life narration, since then no sound. Theorists do not put a word: as if things had been so, why say it again. Mr. Liu Zhenhuan just said: “people can not mourn”, (“British children” editors) Perhaps, people are the kind of mentality, do not want to say. However, we think that the Gucheng phenomenon is a kind of existence and should be studied in a spirit of seeking truth from facts. A young man rushed to the poetry circles, instead of going abroad to seek development from the country, the result, like a just exposed the ground 汩 汩 Qingquan soon vanished. How does this poetic fountain disappear? It can be of benefit to the literary world and to the young literary workers if it can be studied from works and creative ideas.