论文部分内容阅读
目的了解医学生虐待事件中受虐者与非受虐者在个性、自尊、应对方式、抑郁、焦虑之间的差异,为制定预防医学生虐待事件发生的对策提供参考依据。方法采用医学生实习事件调查表、艾森克人格问卷、自尊量表、抑郁自评量表和焦虑自评量表对湖南省6所医学院校的8家附属医院的312名实习医学生进行调查。结果言语、躯体、学业和性骚扰虐待事件中的受虐者与非受虐者之间均在情绪稳定性上存在显著差异(P<0.05～P<0.01)。性别歧视虐待事件中,受虐者与非受虐者之间在内外向性(P<0.05)、情绪稳定性(P<0.01)、积极应对(P<0.01)、消极应对(P<0.01)方面均存在显著差异。言语、躯体、性骚扰和性别歧视虐待事件中,受虐者与非受虐者在焦虑得分上均存在显著差异(P<0.05～P<0.01);学业、性别歧视事件中,受虐者与非受虐者在焦虑得分上均存在显著差异(P<0.05～P<0.01)。结论医学生虐待现象比较普遍。虐待事件的发生与情绪稳定性、内外向性、应对方式有关;虐待事件的发生对学生的抑郁、焦虑水平有影响。
Objective To understand the difference between personality abuse, self-esteem, coping style, depression and anxiety among battered and non-battered medical students in medical maltreatment, and provide a reference for making countermeasures to prevent medical malpractice. Methods A total of 312 interns were enrolled in 8 affiliated hospitals of 6 medical schools in Hunan Province using questionnaire of medical student internship, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, self-esteem scale, self-rating depression scale and self-rating anxiety scale survey. Results There was a significant difference in emotional stability between the abused and non-abused persons in verbal, physical, academic and sexual abuse abuse cases (P <0.05 ~ P <0.01). In sexist abuse cases, there was a significant difference between the abused and non-abused (P <0.05), emotional stability (P <0.01), positive coping (P <0.01) and negative coping (P <0.01) There are significant differences. In the cases of verbal, physical, sexual harassment and sexism abuse, there was significant difference in the anxiety scores between the abused and non-abused (P <0.05 ~ P <0.01). In the academic and gender discrimination cases, The abused person had significant differences in anxiety scores (P <0.05 ~ P <0.01). Conclusion Medical students abuse is more common. The incidence of abuse was related to emotional stability, introversion and extroversion, and coping style. The incidence of abuse affected the level of depression and anxiety.