论文部分内容阅读
围绕着“新现实主义潮流”的讨论已经持续两年有余了。在这次讨论中,众多的专家、学者分别从不同角度就这一文学现象发表了许多不同的、甚至是截然对立的看法。这一方面说明了作为一种处于起步时期并有着充分发展前景的文学潮流,人们对它的认识也将是一个逐渐发展、完善的过程。但另一方面我们也应当注意到:我们在围绕“96年新现实主义潮流”的种种讨论中存在着某些不良倾向,它在很大程度上影响了我们全面、科学地认识这一文学现象。其中的一种普遍倾向突出地表现为把它看着一种孤立的文学现象,仅仅强调它在寻根,先锋文学和新写实小说之后对社会政治、经济生活的可喜回归,并以此为出发点把它与上述历次文
Discussions about the “new realism” have lasted for more than two years. In this discussion, many experts and scholars have expressed many different and even diametrically opposed views on this literary phenomenon from different perspectives. On the one hand, it shows that as a literary trend which is in its infancy and has sufficient prospects for development, people’s understanding of it will also be a process of gradual development and improvement. On the other hand, we should also note that there are some unhealthy tendencies in various discussions surrounding the trend of "neo-realism in 1996. It has greatly affected our understanding of this literary phenomenon in a comprehensive and scientific manner . One of the general tendencies is prominently represented by looking at it as an isolated literary phenomenon, stressing only its gratifying return to socio-political and economic life following roots, avant-garde and new-realistic novels, and as a starting point It goes along with the above episodes