论文部分内容阅读
傅斯年和雷海宗是我国近现代史上颇具影响的史学家。傅氏是史料学派的领军人物,治史宗旨是求真;雷氏是战国策派的主要代表,治史强调经世济国,主张求用。二人持着完全相反的史学功用论。考察二者史学功用论之间存在的差异,对探讨两者的史学思想、史学求真与求用之间的关系以及20世纪20年代末到40年代末的学术史是有典范意义的,所给我们的启示也是意味深长的。
Fu Sinian and Lei Haizong are influential historians in our country’s modern history. Fu is the leader of the historical school, the purpose of governing history is truth; Ray’s is the main representative of the Warring States faction, the history of governance emphasizes the economy through the country, the idea of seeking. The two hold exactly the opposite theory of historiography. It is of great significance to study the differences between the two theories in their study of the theory of history and the relationship between the historical thought of the two and the relationship between the truth and the pursuit of history and the academic history from the late 1920s to the late 1940s. The revelation to us is also meaningful.