王书金、聂树斌,一案两凶,1994年发生在石家庄西郊玉米地里的案件扑朔迷离。作为美剧《犯罪现场调查》的资深剧迷,我怎能不模仿着剧中的套路,在各种可见资料和可寻觅的见证者中寻找每一处蛛丝马迹?但是,看到的线索越多,生出的疑问越多,想对王书金或聂树斌形成100%确认,几乎是不可能的任务。这是一个迄今为止没有见到DNA、血型、指纹、脚印等各种“铁证”的案件。而与这些铁证相比,人的记忆永远是靠不住的,无论他们是当事人、证人还是办案人员。犯罪心理学专家马皑老师告诉我,如果一个人一天经历的事情是100,他能记住的只有3。而对于罪犯来说,他会把作案经过“就像集邮一样”反复玩味,近20年后仍能记住其中细节并不奇怪;当然,记错了或者记混了,也不是没有可能。看来,记忆这东西也像犯罪现场一样,充满或然性和偶然性,不可一概而论。在整理素材的过程中我不断发现,对于同 Wang Shujin, Nie Shubin, a case of two fierce crimes occurred in 1994 in the western suburbs of Shijiazhuang cornfield complicated and confusing. As a veteran fan of the U.S. drama “Crime Scene Investigation,” how can I not trace the routine of the play and look for clues in all kinds of visible information and searchable witnesses? However, the more clues I read, The more doubts arise, it is almost impossible to establish a 100% confirmation of Wang Shujin or Nie Shubin. This is a case that has not seen any DNA, blood type, fingerprints, footprints and so on so far. And compared with these ironclad evidence, people’s memories will never be reliable, whether they are parties, witnesses or investigators. Ma Chi, an expert in criminal psychology, told me that if a person experiences 100 things a day, he can only remember 3. And for criminals, he’ll be committing the crime “like a philatelic” repeatedly and it is not surprising to remember the details in about 20 years; of course, it is not impossible to misrecognize or memorize . It seems that the memory of this thing is like a crime scene, full of probability and contingency, can not be generalized. In the process of sorting materials, I continue to find, for the same