论文部分内容阅读
因朋友向王某借钱,王某担心借款给朋友后有去无回可又拉不下情面,经与好友刘某商定,遂由刘某出面解围：谎称王某已经将钱借给了刘某,王某已无钱可借。为使事情更加真实,刘某还向王某出具了一张借条,内容为：“今借到王某人民币五万元整(用于经商),一年内还清,月利息2分。借款人：刘某2005年2月19日”。谁知,王某于2006年3月因车祸死亡。事后,王妻便持借条向刘某索款。刘某无法提供证据说明真相、双方成讼,法院判决刘某付款。这是为什么?——尹晓翔
Because of friends borrowed money from Wang, Wang worry about borrowing money to friends after no return can pull no less than the situation, and friends Ryu agreed, then by Ryu came forward to rescue: falsely claimed Wang had lent the money Ryu, Wang has no money to borrow. In order to make things more real, Ryu also issued an article to Wang, an article reads: “Now borrowed Wang 50,000 yuan (for business), one year to pay off, the monthly interest of 2 points. : Ryu February 19, 2005 ”. Who knows, Wang died in a car accident in March 2006. Afterwards, the wife will borrow a loan to Liu money. Ryu can not provide proof of the truth, the two parties into lawsuits, the court ruled Liu payment. Why is this? - Yin Xiaoxiang