论文部分内容阅读
萨维尼的法律解释思想以施莱尔马赫的解释学为其哲学渊源,是一种重构作者原意的解释论。萨维尼区分了完善的制定法之解释和不完善的制定法之解释,这种二分架构对于防止解释概念的泛化理解、警惕司法者打着解释的旗号“出释入造”颇具实用价值。萨维尼法律解释的四要素说,是一种旨在发现立法意图的个案解释方法论。只要在立法意图的框架范围内,出现一解与多解是被允许的。从描述性的视角看,萨维尼法律解释范式致力于对以立法语言为媒介的法律文本真实含义的探寻;从规范性的视角看,文法、逻辑、历史和体系解释各自为法律判断提供了分量不同的理由支持。在法律发现和法律论证的意义上,方能深刻理解萨维尼不给法律解释各要素排序的真正原意。解释方法的位阶问题其实是个伪命题。
Savigny’s legal interpretation of ideas to Schleiermacher’s hermeneutics as its philosophical origin, is a reconstruction of the author’s original interpretation theory. Savigny distinguished the interpretation of sound statutory and imperfect statutory interpretations. This dichotomous structure is very useful for preventing the generalization of interpretative concepts and for guarding the banner of interpretations by judicial interpreters value. The four elements of Savigny’s legal interpretation say it is a case-by-case methodology for discovering the legislative intent. As long as there is a solution and multiple solutions within the framework of the legislative intent, it is allowed. From a descriptive perspective, Savigny’s legal interpretation paradigm strives to explore the true meaning of the legal text mediated by the legislative language; from a normative perspective, grammar, logic, history, and institutional interpretation each provide a weight for legal judgment Different reasons to support. In the sense of legal discovery and legal argumentation, Savigny can not fully understand the true meaning of not ordering the law to explain the ordering of the various elements. The level problem of explaining the method is actually a false proposition.