论文部分内容阅读
2012年新刑事诉讼法吸取英美法系国家的经验,在对我国现行刑事证明标准存在的问题进行反思的基础上,将“排除合理怀疑”引入了我国刑事诉讼的证明标准。本文梳理了英美法系国家“排除合理怀疑”的起源与发展,分析了不同学者对“排除合理怀疑”的不同理解。同时,将“排除合理怀疑”与我国传统的“证据确实、充分”的证明标准进行比较,从理论依据、内在要求等各个方面分析二者之间的不同和相似之处。并且结合我国的司法实践,讨论“排除合理怀疑”在我国的适用问题。
In 2012, the new criminal procedure law draws on the experience of Anglo-American legal system countries and on the basis of reviewing the existing problems of criminal proof standards in our country, introduces “proof of reasonable doubt” into the proof standard of criminal procedure in our country. This paper reviews the origins and development of “excluding reasonable suspicions” in Anglo-American legal system countries and analyzes different understandings of different scholars about “excluding reasonable suspicion ”. At the same time, the author compares the proof of “excluding reasonable doubt” with the traditional “proof of evidence” in our country and analyzes the differences and similarities between the two in terms of theoretical basis and inherent requirements. Combined with our country’s judicial practice, to discuss the application of “excluding reasonable doubt” in our country.