论文部分内容阅读
清华大学大学电机系四年级学生刘海洋,为了验证“笨狗熊”的说法能否成立,先后于1月29日和2月23日两次把掺有火碱、硫酸的饮料,倒在了北京动物园饲养的狗熊身上和嘴里,造成三只黑熊、一只马熊、一只棕熊受到不同程度的严重烧伤,其中一只黑熊双目失明。报道一出,社会反响空前。学界也纷纷从教育学、心理学、社会学、法学等不同层面对这一事件进行了深入的思考。可谓是众说纷纭,见仁见智。为此,本刊组织一组笔谈,拟从法理的视角作一番探索。
Liu Haiyang, a fourth-year student of Tsinghua University’s motor department, poured two caustic-soda and sulfuric acid drinks into the Beijing Zoo on January 29 and February 23 one after another to verify the “stupid bear” The bears and bears in their bodies caused three black bears, a bear, and a brown bear to suffer severe burns to varying degrees, with one of the black bears blind. Reported an unprecedented social repercussions. The academic circles also conducted in-depth thinking on this incident from different levels such as education, psychology, sociology and law. Can be described as divergent opinions, a matter of opinion. To this end, the magazine organized a series of written talk, intended to make some exploration from the perspective of jurisprudence.