论文部分内容阅读
前段时间,“嫦娥1号”从38万公里之遥传回第一张月球实拍三维立体效果图,引起校园科学爱好者的极大兴趣。关心国家航空航天事业的青少年,难掩对星空的激情,纷纷在网上跟贴,他们或回顾人类航天大事记,或憧憬未来中国宇航员登月的壮景。这其中,既有理性的探讨,也有以讹传讹的误解。而对于一些争议性话题,大家甚至不惜祭出“网骂”将PK进行到底。PK是好事,但没有将科学依据作为论战基础的PK就显得十分无厘头了。无厘头的PK,亟待公正的裁判加入。现在,由“科学”这个裁判来解读PK双方不得不知的三个航天真相。
Some time ago, “Chang No.1” passed back from the 380,000 kilometers back to the first three-dimensional renderings of the actual shooting of the moon, causing great interest to campus science enthusiasts. The young people who are concerned about the national aerospace industry can hardly hide their passion for the starry sky and follow them online. They either look back at the human space memorabilia or watch the future of Chinese astronauts landing on the moon. Among them, there are both rational and misunderstandings. For some of the controversial topics, we did not hesitate to resort to “net” to carry out PK. PK is a good thing, but there is no PK that does not use the scientific basis as the basis of controversy. Nonsensical PK, to be joined by just referees. Now, the “scientific” judge will interpret the three aerospace truths that PK both sides must know.