论文部分内容阅读
《集邮博览》2013年6月、8月、12月分别刊登了“改退批条”的研究文章,据悉也有邮协会员已在或正在编撰“改退批条”邮集。笔者收集了两枚国际邮件退回批条实寄封,对上面的批语百思不得其解,现将其展示出来,请《集邮博览》读者指点。其一、2012年3月7日由北京前门大街邮局过秤、收寄、盖戳、航空寄美国,然而却在3月15日由北京丰台区科学城邮局盖戳,退回寄信者(图1)。此信贴面值1.20元邮票5枚,0.6元邮票一
Philately Expo published research articles on “Retiring and Rejecting Approval Article” in June, August and December 2013, respectively. It is reported that some members of the association have been or are currently editing postal articles. I collected two international e-mail back to the batch of the actual seal, the batch of comments beyond doubt, now it is displayed, please “Philatelic Expo” readers pointing. First, on March 7, 2012, it was weighed by the post office of Qianmen Street in Beijing, received, stamped and airmail sent to the United States. However, it was stamped by the post office of Fengtai District Science City on March 15 and returned to the sender (Figure 1) . This letter posted face value 1.20 yuan stamps 5, 0.6 yuan stamps one