罗赞诺夫对陀思妥耶夫斯基创作的继承不可否认,但其在继承基础上的创新性更具特色。目前学界大多着眼于承继而忽略创新,这种单一视角势必难以挖掘罗氏文体的独特魅力。本文通过对二者的异同进行对比研究,试图解读罗氏创作中对“非文学的文学”形式的探索,对新文体中复调的建构,断续思想的特点以及作者形象与狂欢化。 Rozanov’s succession to Dostoyevsky’s creation is undeniable, but its innovation based on inheritance is even more distinctive. At present, most of the academic circles focus on inheriting and neglecting innovation. It is inevitable that such a single perspective can not excavate the unique charm of Roche style. By comparing the similarities and differences between the two, this article tries to explain the exploration of “non-literary literature” in Roche’s writing, the characteristics of the polyphony in the new style, the characteristics of the intermittent thinking and the author’s image and carnivalization.