论文部分内容阅读
在团体性自陈式人格测验中,由于各种原因的存在经常会出现被试不配合测验的情况,严重影响测验的信度和效度。反应定势区分为社会希望性反应、掩饰、恶作剧式的认真回答、随机反应、规律性选择和空白选择等六种类型。对此,应对策略为事前控制和事后识别。事前控制技术主要包括:测验编制尽量采用经验量表策略,少采用理性量表策略;通过布局、造势的方法迫使被试配合测试。事后识别技术则主要是编制测谎量表:对于经验策略量表主要是检测是否存在空白题、随机反应和规律性选择;对于理性量表则主要是探查被试的作伪动机。特别需要指出是在事后识别技术中,适合于认知测验的反应时和IRT技术不适合团体性的自陈式人格测验作伪动机的检测。
In the group self-reported personality test, because of various reasons, the test often does not match the test, which seriously affects the reliability and validity of the test. Responsiveness is divided into six types: social hopeful reaction, concealment, serious mischievous answer, random response, regular choice and blank choice. In this regard, coping strategies are ex ante control and ex post identification. Pre-control technology include: test preparation as much as possible the use of experience scale strategy, less rational scale strategy; through the layout, the momentum of the method of forcing the test with the test. The technique of post-mortem recognition is mainly used to prepare the polygraph scale: For the experience strategy scale, it is mainly to detect the existence of blank questions, random reactions and regular choices; for the rational scale, the subjects are mainly motivated by false statements. In particular, it needs to be pointed out that in the post-recognition technology, the response time and the IRT technology suitable for cognitive tests are not suitable for the testing of the pseudo-motivation of group-based self-reported personality tests.