论文部分内容阅读
在贵州,几乎同期发生,并都因一名中学生死亡引发大规模群众聚集事件,因为处置方式不同,效果迥然不同。在瓮安,引发上万群众聚集,打砸烧公安局办公大楼的恶性事件,在德江,则及时疏导几百名聚集群众,成功阻止了更大事件的爆发。不同的处置方式之下,群众对政府的态度发生了从对抗到对话、从抵制到参与、从质疑到信任的转变。 2008年6月15日6时,德江县110指挥中心接到群众报警:
In Guizhou, almost the same period occurred, and large-scale mass gatherings were triggered by the death of a secondary school student. Because of the different disposal methods, the effects were very different. In Weng’an, tens of thousands of people were mobilized to smash the vicious incident that burned the office building of the Public Security Bureau. In the Dejiang River, hundreds of people were mobilized in time to stop the outbreak of even greater incidents. Under different modes of disposal, the people’s attitude toward the government changed from confrontation to dialogue, from resistance to participation, from questioning to trust. At 6:00 on June 15, 2008, Dejiang County 110 command center received a public alarm: