对于我国应否建立第三人侵害债权制度,我国大部分学者皆持肯定态度,但对于第三人侵害债权的形态和构成要件以及第三人责任等问题意见并不统一。本文对一些批判“第三人的债权制度”的观点进行了思考,提出了第三人侵害债权的构成要件的新的内涵,从而说明该制度建立的合理性。 Most of our scholars hold a positive attitude toward whether or not China should establish a third party system of infringement of claims. However, opinions on the form and composition of the third party’s claims of infringement and the responsibility of the third party are not uniform. In this paper, some critics of the “third party claims system ” point of view made a third person against the elements of the composition of the new connotations, thus illustrating the rationality of the establishment of the system.