论文部分内容阅读
近日,西安市雁塔区人民法院17名陪审员被劝退或主动辞职的新闻,引起人们广泛关注。建立合理的退出机制,彰显了人民法院强化司法民主、保障公正、提升公信力的决心。近年来,适用陪审进行审理的案件比例虽然不断增长,但由于人员数量有限、案件分配不均、权利保障不力等多方面原因,公众对于陪审员在司法审判过程中是否真正发挥了表达民意、监督法官的实际作用抱有疑问。只有真正扩大参与、优化
Recently, 17 jurors in Yanta District People’s Court in Xi’an were either dismissed or voluntarily resigned, arousing widespread public concern. Establishing a reasonable exit mechanism demonstrates the determination of the people’s court to strengthen judicial democracy, ensure fairness and enhance credibility. In recent years, although the proportion of cases that apply to trial by jury has been on the rise, due to the limited number of personnel, the uneven distribution of cases and the ineffective protection of rights, the public have really expressed their opinions and opinions over jury trials, The actual role of the judge has questions. Only truly expand participation, optimization