Joe Biden’s‘Trumpism’

来源 :Beijing Review | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:zjzjzj13
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读



  U.S. President Joe Biden emerged from the election as a redeemer, promising to put Donald Trump’s mistakes behind him and lead the country back on track. But after more than four months in office, Biden has not really lived up to his promise, with the domestic and foreign policies of the United States essentially following the path set by his predecessor: “Trumpism,” just without Trump. This is particularly evident in China-U.S. relations.
  On May 26, two important events took place in the field of China-U.S. relations. The first was Biden requesting the CIA, not the scientists, to accelerate its investigation into the origin of COVID-19, including the possibility that it emerged from a lab accident; which was perceived as a slight at China. The second, also that night, was U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai’s dialogue with Liu He, Vice Premier of China, and chief of the Chinese side of the China-U.S. Comprehensive Economic Dialogue. These two seemingly separate events reflect the same problem: Biden is still using Trump’s strategy of dealing with China.
  One important reason why Biden won the 2020 presidential election was because he called for a scientific fight against the pandemic—in sharp contrast with Trump who refused to wear a mask and blamed China for the pandemic. Also, on January 26, with Biden in office no more than one week, he signed a memorandum banning phrases such as “China Virus” and “Wuhan pneumonia.” Although this act was intended to please Asian Americans, it played a role in the recovery of China-U.S. relations. Shortly thereafter, as reported by CNN, the Biden administration also terminated the virus tracing program initiated by former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on the grounds of having no evidence COVID-19 originated from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
  Nevertheless, Biden did a sudden about-face and started following in the footsteps of Trump: bringing up again the conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was leaked from the WIV, which has long been debunked by world scientists. Ironically, the Wall Street Journal article repeating Biden’s lines was penned by Michael R. Gordon, the same writer who spread the disinformation that Iraq had possessed weapons of mass destruction back in 2002.
  Biden seems to have no intention of making any changes on trade either. In the run-up to the election, he attacked Trump’s tariff policies, claiming his trade war against China and the tariffs primarily hurt American manufacturing and agricultural sectors, and ultimately the American taxpayer. He promised to reverse the situation if he got elected.   Yet that did not happen and the tariffs are still there.
  If we look back at the China-U.S. relations over the past four months since Biden took office, it is easy to see no significant changes have been made to Trump’s China policy.
  Bilateral relations even deteriorated as Biden tried to use “value diplomacy” to target China: interfering in China’s internal affairs under the pretext of human rights; setting up anti-China alliances by driving a wedge between China and Europe and Indo-Pacific countries; and sending more arms to China’s Taiwan. The Biden administration continues to drive China-U.S. relations in an antagonizing direction.
  Even if Biden says he wants to abandon the “America First” policy, the new $6 trillion economic stimulus plan or the much-criticized “vaccine protectionism” is in essence a form of “Trumpism”—characterized by economic nationalism and diplomatic unilateralism.
  The world was optimistic that with the departure of Trump, Pompeo, et al., the U.S. would rekindle its relations with China so that the two major economies could work together to fight the pandemic and deal with other pressing issues of our time.
  Nevertheless, the Biden administration wants to secure both its economic and security interests but is willing to compromise on neither. To many, it looks as though he is merely tinkering with his predecessor’s legacy, unable to escape Trump’s clout. BR
其他文献
The drain in Zhou Jian’s bathroom is clogged with hair again. The 48-year-old has a buzz cut and lives alone, but he said the drain blocks twice a month. “It never happened when I was in Shanghai. I’m
期刊
The U.S. State Department lawyers have concluded there’s no evidence to prove “genocide” in Xinjiang. The UK Parliament has decided it’s a job for the lawyers not the government.  So, what is it that
期刊
If you have a chance to talk with a historical figure, who would you like it to be? What would you like to know about the past or share from today? China in the Classics, a new TV show based on Chines
期刊
Jigme Dorje, Du Fuguo and Peng Shilu. These names may sound unfamiliar to the foreign ear, but when their stories are told, everyone will find in them qualities they can identify with.  Jigme Dorje is
期刊
FAMOUS ARCHITECT AWARDED JULY 1 MEDAL  Wu Liangyong, a famous architect, educator and founder of the science of human settlements, was recently awarded the July 1 Medal for outstanding Party members b
期刊
Jiang Li’s fondest childhood memory brims with images of The Legend of the White Snake. The classic TV series based on a Chinese folktale is in fact the same age as Jiang, having premiered in 1992.  T
期刊
The current world order produces a sentiment of anxiety and fear within the international community. China’s development is often interpreted in negative terms by the West and this evaluation shapes a
期刊
A smartphone and a dog are all Lin Ran needs for a relaxed weekend at home. She spends over 10 hours a day on the phone, switching between apps, ordering food, watching TV episodes and short videos, a
期刊
Gong Weiquan is the head- master of a middle school in a village in Yunnan Province in southwest China. But last October, he was given a task, just like his students. Gong took part in a training prog
期刊
Much has been written about China’s socialist market economy since October 1992, when the concept was formally endorsed. Many have debated its true nature. Is it really a socialist or a market economy
期刊