论文部分内容阅读
《最高人民法院关于人民法院民事执行中拍卖、变卖财产的规定》对人民法院执行过程中查扣财产的司法拍卖次数作了明确的限定。但在实践中发现,这种绝对化的次数限定在部分案件的执行过程中可能会引发一些问题,导致既无法实现当初设立该制度的目的,也可能在程序设计上额外增加了申请执行人实现被救济权利的风险。本文针对设立该制度的目的,列举限定司法拍卖次数可能引发的常见问题,对比与其相似的我国台湾地区的做法,分析改进该制度的理由,探讨解决问题的对策。
The Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Auctioning and Sale of Property in the Civil Execution of People’s Courts have clearly defined the number of judicial auctions in which property is seized during the execution of the people’s court. However, it has been found in practice that the limitation on the number of such absolutes may cause some problems in the execution of some cases, resulting in the failure to achieve the original purpose of setting up the system or the additional design of program implementers Risk of being relieved of rights. This article aims to establish the system for the purpose of listing the common problems that may be triggered by the limited number of judicial auctions, comparing with similar practices in Taiwan of our country, analyzing the reasons for improving the system and discussing the solutions to the problems.