伽达默尔所说的“传统”的主体生产性与参与性是如何在寻根小说中得到体现的 ?寻根小说的投向历史时间的“深度意识”与 2 0世纪 80年代知识分子执著于当下的文化启蒙情怀有何关联 ?等等 ,这些问题在此前的研究中尚未得到充分探讨。本文通过对《棋王》、《爸爸爸》、《小鲍庄》等寻根小说的重读 ,发现了其理论与实践、宣言与文本、主观与客观之间的断裂 ,指出正是由于知识分子的精英文化巨型想象 ,扭曲了寻根小说的文化原生性 ,使得魏紫姚黄的地域、民族文化最后殊途同归 ,导致了寻根小说的模式化品格 How did Gadamer’s “traditional” main productiveness and participation be reflected in the root-seeking novels? The “deep-seated consciousness” of seeking a root-seeking novel in historical time and the devotion of contemporary intellectuals in the 1980s to the present Cultural enlightenment and so on? And so on, these issues in the previous study has not yet been fully explored. Through the rereading of root-seeking novels such as “Chess King”, “Daddy Daddy” and “Xiao Baozhuang”, this article finds the break between theory and practice, declaration and text, subjectivity and objectivity, and points out that it is precisely because of the elite Cultural giant imagination distorts the cultural originality of the root-seeking novels, making Wei Ziyao’s regional and national culture the same as the last but not the least, resulting in the stylized character of the Xun root novels