论文部分内容阅读
器官异位案件损害后果的典型性及医疗过错的不典型性,不具有指导医疗损害赔偿案件的普遍意义。最高人民法院针对此案发布的司法解释,在一定程度上促成了当下医疗纠纷的非理性解决。局限于医患双方的损害赔偿思维模式,把医生与患者挤向对立,不可能根本解决医患矛盾。医患之间的责任空白带不应由医方承担。突破医疗特殊性的后果是看病更难看病更贵,医患矛盾直接演变为利益之争。医疗过错的鉴定应遵循法定程序,并以医学专业知识为基础,以理性人的合理标准作为原则。
The typical consequences of the damage caused by organ ectopic cases and atypical medical malpractice do not have the universal significance of guiding the case of compensation for medical damages. Judicial interpretation released by the Supreme People’s Court in response to this case contributed to some extent to an irrational solution to the current medical disputes. Confined to both doctors and patients damage compensation thinking mode, the doctor and the patient squeeze the opposite, it is impossible to fundamentally solve the doctor-patient conflicts. The blame should not be borne by the doctor. The consequence of breaking medical specialties is that it is more difficult to see a doctor and the contradiction between doctors and patients directly evolves into a dispute of interests. The identification of medical malpractice should follow legal procedures and be based on medical expertise and the principle of rational human reasonableness.