一郭预衡先生《中国散文史》选论的作品 ,与传统的文学史有所不同。先生在《散文史》中所凝注的厚重的人生与历史的沧桑感 ,更是传统的文学史所少有的。首先说选材。就《散文史》所叙的清初散文部分看 ,在“学者之文”和“文人之文”中 ,先生所论学术之文愈少 ,而文学之文益多? The works of Mr. Guo Yuheng’s Selected Essays on the History of Chinese Prose differ from the traditional literary history. The heavy life and the vicissitudes of history that Mr. imprisoned in “Prose History” are even more rare in the history of traditional literature. First of all, material selection. As far as “Prose History” is concerned, the essay in the early Qing Dynasty shows that in the articles of “scholars of literature” and “literati,” there are fewer academic articles on the texts and fewer articles of literature.