论文部分内容阅读
最新出台的《最高人民法院关于行政诉讼证据若干问题的规定》(以下简称为《规定》)明确了在庭审中当事人对鉴定人发问的权利 ,规定鉴定人出庭的条件以及不出庭的情况 ,并在原有诉讼参与人的基础上增设了专业人员这种新型的诉讼参与人。这些规定保障了直接和言辞原则在诉讼中的贯彻 ,弥补了当事人相关专门知识的不足 ,是对当事人诉讼权利的切实保障 ,是对鉴定结论质证制度的进一步完善。但是 ,《规定》仍存在一些待完善之处
The newly promulgated Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Certain Issues Concerning Evidence in Administrative Proceedings (hereinafter referred to as the “Provisions”) clearly stipulate the parties’ right to question witnesses, the conditions for attending appearances in court and the non-appearance of court witnesses, Litigation participants based on the addition of professionals this new litigation participants. These provisions guarantee the implementation of the principle of directness and speech in the litigation, make up for the deficiency of relevant expertise of the litigant, effectively guarantee litigant right of litigation, and further perfect the system of evidence verification of the conclusion of appraisal. However, there are still some areas for improvement under the “Provisions”