论文部分内容阅读
目的主要探讨、研究剖宫产术后再次妊娠的最佳分娩方式。方法选取98例剖宫产术后再次妊娠的孕妇作为研究对象,将其分为再次择期剖宫产和经阴道生产二组。对二种分娩方式的子宫破裂、出血等进行比较。结果再次剖宫产与经阴道生产二组子宫破裂的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),出血发生率再次择期剖宫产组明显高于经阴道分娩组,新生儿窒息的发生率二组比较差异无统计学意义。结论剖宫产后再次妊娠的时间>2年为宜,可经阴道试产,试产失败或此次妊娠有手术指征可行剖宫产术。
The purpose of the main study to study the best method of delivery after cesarean pregnancy again. Methods Ninety-eight pregnant women who were re-pregnant after cesarean section were selected as study subjects and divided into two groups: cesarean section and vaginal production. The two modes of delivery of uterine rupture, bleeding, etc. were compared. Results There was no significant difference in the incidence of uterine rupture between the two groups after cesarean section and vaginal production (P> 0.05). The incidence of hemorrhage was significantly higher in cesarean section group than in vaginal delivery group, neonatal asphyxia No significant difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Conclusion Cesarean section after pregnancy again> 2 years is appropriate, can be vaginal trial production, trial fails or the pregnancy indications for cesarean section feasible.