论文部分内容阅读
后发展国家的政府常常通过创办或扶持少数冠军企业的策略来培育技术复杂度高、不直接面向消费者的战略性产业。在近代中国,国民政府先后创立过3家冠以“中央”之名的机器厂(公司),希望藉此培育装备制造业,这可以视为典型的冠军企业策略。然而,由于国民政府发展战略产业时,同时受到经济动机与非经济性的战略动机的支配,在不同阶段主导动机不同,产业政策所取得的成绩也就大不相同。国民政府的历史经验表明,在资源有限的情形下,后发展国家的政府培育战略产业时,必须在市场原则与技术原则间作出选择,而冠军企业策略需要政府长期大量投入资源,故只有在国家意志坚决的情况下才有可能获得成功。
Governments in the post-development countries often foster strategic industries that are technically complex and do not directly target consumers through the strategy of creating or supporting a handful of champions. In modern China, the National Government has successively established three machine shops (companies) under the name of “Central Government” in the hope of nurturing the equipment manufacturing industry. This can be regarded as a typical champion corporate strategy. However, as the national government develops its strategic industries, it is dominated by both the strategic motives of economy and non-economy, and the leading motives are different at different stages. The achievements made by industrial policies are also very different. The historical experience of the National Government shows that under the conditions of limited resources, the government of the developing countries must choose between market principles and technical principles when developing the strategic industries. However, the champion enterprise strategy requires the government to invest a large amount of resources for a long time. Therefore, Will be successful if determined.