论文部分内容阅读
真名同志写的这篇文章,给我们广大读者提出了一个非常深刻、非常有意义的问题。我们有些同志教了几十年的铅球,或研究了几十年的教材,对为什么要教这个教材,似乎想得不多,或想得不深,或难以作出令人满意的回答。这个问题之所以提得深刻,是因为它涉及到了选用教材的原则和依据、教材教学的目的和任务等重要的理论问题,这实质上也是一个教学指导思想的问题。这个问题之所以提得有意义,是因为它将涉及到与滑步推铅球性质相似的一系列竞技项目教材的问题,从而又涉及到教材体系与教改方向问题等。为此,我们热烈欢迎广大读者能积极参加讨论与争鸣。 然而,在此必须明确指出:本讨论只是从理论上进行探索研究,也许在讨论中可能涉及到现行教学大纲的内容和《国家体育锻炼标准》的测验项目问题,但在研究结果未被决策管理部门采纳以前,研究归研究,实践归实践。在研究这一问题过程中,希望大家继续做好贯彻大纲和达标的工作。
This essay written by real names comrades has given our readers a very profound and very meaningful question. Some of our comrades taught for decades the shots or studied the teaching materials for several decades. There seems to be little or no thought on how to teach this textbook, or it is difficult to make a satisfactory answer. The reason why this question is profound is that it involves important theoretical issues such as the principle and basis for the selection of textbooks, the purpose and tasks of textbook teaching, and is essentially a question of teaching guiding ideology. The reason why this question makes sense is that it involves the issue of a series of competing project textbooks that are similar in nature to the slide-stroke shot, which in turn involves the textbook system and the direction of the reform of education. To this end, we warmly welcome readers to participate actively in discussions and contention. However, it must be clearly pointed out here that this discussion is only theoretical exploration and research. Perhaps the content of the current syllabus may be involved in the discussion and the quiz project of the National Physical Training Standards. However, if the research result is not governed by decision-making Before the adoption of the department, research should be returned to practice and practice should be practiced. In the course of studying this issue, I hope everyone will continue to carry out the work of implementing the outline and standardization.