论文部分内容阅读
本文选取作为北方传统城市的典型一一“小天津”临清作为对象,对造成城市衰落的内因及它们之间的内部运行机制进行研究。传统社会中,建立城市要先考虑其在政治、军事上的控制功能。“行政框架”为城市提供了最初的也是最主要的消费者,它为每个同级别的城市都提供了一个大致相当的发展基础。但是,即便发展基础(或行政框架)相当的城市,其“冲、繁、疲、要”程度也不完全相同,发展际遇与发展程度也不会完全相同,这些就是促进一个城市发展的加权因素。随着城市加权因素(以经济因素为主)的发展,统治者会相应上调城市的行政级别。新的“行政框架”为城市的发展提供了新的基础和资源。反之,城市衰落首先表现为促成城市发展各种加权因素不断剥落。行政框架是抵制城市持续衰落的最后一道防线,只要行政框架存在,城市的衰落就是有底线的。
This article chooses Linqing, a typical small city in northern China as an example, to study the internal causes of urban decline and the internal operation mechanism between them. In traditional society, establishing a city should first consider its political and military control functions. The “administrative framework” provided the city with its first and foremost consumers, providing a broadly comparable basis of development for every city of its class. However, even if the city with the basic (or administrative) framework is developed, its degree of development will not be exactly the same as that of cities with developed infrastructure or administrative frameworks, and these will promote the development of a city Weighting factors. With the development of urban weighting factors (mainly economic factors), the rulers will correspondingly raise the administrative level of cities. The new “administrative framework” provides a new foundation and resource for the development of the city. On the contrary, the decline of the city is firstly manifested in continuous exfoliation of various weighting factors that promote the urban development. The administrative framework is the last line of defense against the continuous decline of the city. As long as the administrative framework exists, the decline of the city is the bottom line.