论文部分内容阅读
环境法的调整方法离不开国家干预,但现行环境法规范中对于不同类型国家干预手段的选择与配置存在结构失衡的特点,指令性国家干预比例过大,指导性国家干预和直接介入性国家干预比例过小,不能反映国家干预在纠正市场缺陷、培育和扶持新兴市场方面的功能和特点,不能彰显经济手段解决环境问题的独立功用。因此,不同类型的国家干预手段在我国环境法中的整合与重构显得尤为重要,并直接影响我国环境法体系及其制度内容的重大变革和调整。
The adjustment method of environmental law is inseparable from state intervention. However, there are structural imbalances in the selection and allocation of intervention measures for different types of countries in the existing environmental law norms. The proportion of mandatory state interventions is too large, and the intervention of guiding state interventions and directly interventional countries The intervention ratio is too small to reflect the functions and characteristics of state intervention in correcting market defects, nurturing and supporting emerging markets, and can not demonstrate the independent function of economic means to solve environmental problems. Therefore, the integration and reconstruction of different types of state interventions in environmental law of our country are particularly important, and will directly affect the major changes and adjustments of the environmental law system and its system in our country.