论文部分内容阅读
宋代学术以理学为特色,与之相应,在史书的修纂中形成了义理史学一类,以孙甫《唐史论断》、范祖禹《唐鉴》、朱熹《资治通鉴纲目》等书为代表,主张在史学中以微言大义为旨,不太重视历史事实的考据。但是此类史书在宋代史学史中并不占据主要地位,占主要地位的当属以求真求信为目的的考据史学,这类史著包括在修史过程中附录考史成果的《资治通鉴考异》、《续资治通鉴长编》、《建炎以来系年要录》中的考异等,这些著作在宋
In the Song Dynasty, academic science was characterized by Neo-Confucianism. Correspondingly, the history of science was formed in the compilation of historical books. The books of Sun Fu’s “History of Tang Dynasty”, “Fanzao Yu”, “Tang Dynasty” Representatives, advocating in the history of micro-righteous purpose, do not pay much attention to the historical facts of the test. However, such history books do not occupy a major position in the historical history of Song Dynasty, which occupies the main position in the history of the textual research of examination for the purpose of seeking truth and seeking truth. Such historical works include “Zi Zhi Tong Kam different test ”,“ Continuation of the general rule Zhuanxuan Chang ”,“ Jian Yan years since the record, ”the test of differences in these works in the Song