论文部分内容阅读
自《中国书法》八九年第二期发表陈炜湛先生《书家与学者》一文后,书法界不少中、青已大体意识到学书与做学问之间的关系,逐渐将自己的视野引向理论深度,这无疑说是一种极好的现象。只是陈先生在文章中所谈的书家与学者的关系较为宽泛、较为笼统,在某些方面往往尚会使青年读者造成错误的理解,我觉得有必要做进一步补充。一、关于“书家学者化” “书家学者化”这句话是说,书家不能单纯地写字(在此姑且称为书家,因为单纯写字就不能称得上书家,亦不可能成为书家),还要做学问,使自己逐渐向学者型书家过度。如果理解不错的话,
Since the publication of the book Calligraphers and Scholars by Mr. Chen Weizhan in the second issue of “Chinese Calligraphy” in 1989, quite a lot of the calligraphers have generally realized the relationship between learning and learning and gradually drawing their own perspectives To the depth of theory, which is undoubtedly an excellent phenomenon. Only Mr. Chen in the article talked about the relationship between book and scholars more general, more general, often in some aspects will still lead to a misunderstanding of young readers, I think it is necessary to further supplement. First, on the “scholarly book ” “scholarly book ” This sentence is to say, the booker can not simply write (here tentatively called book, because simply write can not be called a book, It is impossible to become a book writer), but also to make knowledge, so that he gradually over to scholarly book writer. If you understand well,