论文部分内容阅读
媒体错用法律术语现象比较普遍,如“罚款”“罚金”这两个不同的法律术语就常常被误用,误导读者。例一:杭州《都市快报》2006年9月8日第3版《偷牛仔裤不予追究(引题)判你是因为你亮出弹簧刀(主题)坐牢四年罚款四千(副题)》。例二:2006年8月30日《都市快报》第52版《城管的罚单也要及时处理(主题)否则不但要交罚金还会通不过车子年检(副题)》。罚款通常指行政处罚的种类之一,杭州市城市管理行政执法局作为行政机关所作出的只能是行政处罚,因此,例二对违章停车车主的处理只能是行政处罚,
Misuse of legal media, the phenomenon is more common, such as “fines ” “fines ” these two different legal terms are often misused, misleading readers. Example 1: Hangzhou “City Express” September 8, 2006 Third Edition “steal jeans will not be held accountable (quote) sentenced you because you come up with a spring knife (subject) four years in prison for a fine of four thousand (subtitle).” Example 2: August 30, 2006 “City Express” 52nd Edition “urban management of the tickets must also be promptly addressed (subject) Otherwise, not only to pay the fine will pass the car inspection (subtitle).” Penalty usually refers to one of the types of administrative penalties, Hangzhou City Administrative Enforcement Bureau as an administrative agency made only administrative penalties, therefore, the second case of illegal parking owners can only be administrative penalties,