论文部分内容阅读
产品缺陷致损,乃加害给付之典型情况,合同法违约责任保护的是履行利益和固有利益,即可以保护电视机本身以及其他的人身、财产所造成的损失,但是却不能够填补精神损害。而根据产品质量法41条前段的规定,产品本身的损害并不能获得赔偿,只能就缺陷产品以外的部分进行赔偿,即本案中的精神损害与人身伤害和房屋损害的部分。而侵权责任法则将这些损害全部囊括于侵权损害赔偿之下。在实务中,应对侵权法41条做出解释,认为其采用了请求权规范竞合说,用于完全的填补被害人的损失。
Damage caused by product defects, is a typical case of harmful payment, contract liability breach of contract to protect the interests and intrinsic interests that can protect the TV itself and other personal and property losses, but they can not fill the mental damage. However, according to the provisions of the preceding paragraph of Article 41 of the Quality Assurance Law, the damage of the product itself can not be compensated, and only the part other than the defective product can be compensated, that is, the part of mental injury and personal injury and house damage in this case. The law of tort liability will be included in all these damages under the tort damages. In practice, the article 41 of the Tort Law should be explained, and it is considered that it adopts the competing theory of claim right to completely fill the victim’s losses.