论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨抗心律失常药物不良反应的分析。方法选取我院2015年3月~2017年5月收治应用抗心律失常药物治疗患者120例,将这些患者的临床资料作为主要的研究对象,对这些患者进行随机分组处理,主要将患者分为研究组和对比组,各60例,研究组患者为快速性心律失常治疗的方式加以治疗,对比组患者主要实施慢性心律失常治疗的方式加以治疗,对两组患者的治疗有效率和患者的血液动力学改变情况等对胺碘酮疗效的影响加以观察和对比分析。结果在在对快速性心律失常合并血液动力学改变的患者加以治疗的时候,患者在经过电复律后使用胺碘酮治疗的方式下,其治疗的总有效率为88.5%,而和不存在血液动力学改变的患者在进行治疗情况相比较的时候,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论抗心律失常药物的种类相对较多,在进行临床用药治疗的时候,需要遵循简单有效的用药原则对患者进行药物治疗实施,需要对其中治疗效果比较高和反应情况比较小的药物加以选择,对患者临床治疗救治的成功率不断提升。
Objective To investigate the adverse reactions of antiarrhythmic drugs. Methods A total of 120 patients treated with antiarrhythmic drugs were selected from March 2015 to May 2017 in our hospital. The clinical data of these patients were selected as the main study subjects. The patients were randomly divided into treatment groups Group and control group, 60 cases in each group. Patients in the study group were treated with tachyarrhythmia treatment. Patients in the control group were treated mainly with chronic arrhythmia. The treatment efficiency and patient’s hemodynamics Changes in school conditions on the efficacy of amiodarone to observe and comparative analysis. Results In the treatment of tachyarrhythmia with hemodynamic changes in patients treated when patients after amiodarone after electrical cardioversion treatment, the treatment of the total effective rate was 88.5%, and the absence of Patients with haemodynamic changes had no significant difference in the treatment status (P> 0.05). Conclusions There are relatively many types of antiarrhythmic drugs. In clinical drug treatment, the patients need to follow the simple and effective principles of drug treatment, and the drugs with higher therapeutic effect and less reaction conditions need to be selected. The success rate of clinical treatment of patients continues to improve.