论文部分内容阅读
目的:探究腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床效果差异。方法:选择2014年1月至2015年7月来重庆市北碚合美家医院就诊的子宫肌瘤患者92例为研究对象,采用随机数字表法,将所有患者随机分为对照组(给予传统开腹子宫肌瘤剔除术)与观察组(给予腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术),比较两组患者的临床治疗效果。结果:观察组患者的住院时间及并发症的发生均明显少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访12个月,两组患者的肌瘤残留率及复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术与传统开腹手术均是治疗子宫肌瘤的有效手段,但腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术围手术期的临床效果更好。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of laparoscopic myomectomy and conventional laparotomy on uterine fibroids. Methods: From January 2014 to July 2015, 92 patients with uterine leiomyoma treated by Beijiao Hemei Hospital in Chongqing were enrolled. All patients were randomly divided into control group (given traditional open Abdominal myomectomy) and observation group (given laparoscopic myomectomy), the clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared. Results: The hospitalization time and complications of the observation group were significantly less than those of the control group (P <0.05). The follow-up of 12 months, the two groups of patients with fibroid residual rate and recurrence rate, the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Laparoscopic myomectomy and traditional laparotomy are effective methods for the treatment of uterine fibroids. However, the clinical effect of perioperative laparoscopic myomectomy is better.