姚老师钧鉴: 看了贵刊一篇学术书简:《对〈学术规范与新闻学研究的深化〉一文的质疑》,觉得加强学生的基础知识教育和综合能力的培养是十分重要的。这位学生的驳论,逻辑混乱,自相矛盾。兹略述如下: 作者说:“作为一门科学,我国的新闻学理论体系中确实没有‘人民性’这个概念。”是不符合事实的。他论据是马克思只在1842年《第六届莱茵省议会的辩论》中提过一次“自由出版物的人民性”,以后再也没提过“人民性”这个词。同时,列宁也“从未使用过‘人民性’这个词。”“毛泽东也十分重视报刊宣传的党性原则”,因此作者下结论说:“既然作为无产阶级新闻事业重要奠基人和开拓者的革命导师们都没有深入阐述过党报的人民性,那么我们社会 Jun Jun, Professor Yao: Having read an academic book in your edition: “A Questioning on the Deepening of Academic Standards and the Study of Journalism”, I think it is very important to strengthen students’ basic knowledge education and comprehensive ability cultivation. The student’s refutation, confused logic, self-contradictory. Here is a brief summary: The author states: “As a science, there is indeed no concept of ’people’ in our theoretical system of journalism.” It is not true. His argument is that Marx referred to “the people’s character of free publications” only in the “Debate on the Sixth Rhine Parliament” in 1842, and never mentioned the term “people’s sex” afterwards. At the same time, Lenin also “never used the term ’people’s nature.’” “Mao Zedong also attached great importance to the party’s principle of propaganda in newspapers and periodicals.” Therefore, the author concluded: "Since the revolution as an important founder and pioneer of proletarian journalism Instructors did not elaborate on the people’s party newspaper, then our society