论文部分内容阅读
目的探索一种适合结核病防治效果综合评价的数理统计方法。方法运用TOPSIS法和RSR分档法相结合对各评价单位的综合评价效果进行排序和分档。结果14个市综合评价排序结果为:好包括南宁、桂林;中包括贵港、崇左、柳州、贺州、玉林、梧州、河池、防城、百色;差包括北海、来宾、钦州。且各组差异具有统计学意义。结论TOPSIS法及RSR分档适合于结核病防治效果的综合评价。
Objective To explore a mathematical statistics method suitable for the comprehensive evaluation of tuberculosis control. Methods TOPSIS method and RSR method were used to combine and evaluate the comprehensive evaluation results of each evaluation unit. Results The results of the comprehensive evaluation of 14 cities were as follows: Good included Nanning and Guilin; including Guigang, Chongzuo, Liuzhou, Hezhou, Yulin, Wuzhou, Hechi, Fangcheng and Baise; poor included Beihai, Laibin and Qinzhou. The difference between each group was statistically significant. Conclusion TOPSIS and RSR are suitable for the comprehensive evaluation of tuberculosis prevention and treatment.