对塑性细观力学模型的割线模量法、各向同性化的切线模量法、各向异性化的切线模量法和弹性约束法的适用性及预测结果进行了分析比较表明，在变形较小的情况下各向异性化的切线模量法能较好地预测复合材料的拉伸和循环硬化性能，各向同性化的切线模量法和割线模量法较适用于对单向拉伸的预测，而弹性约束法的预测则偏高． The secant modulus method, the isotropic tangent modulus method, the anisotropic tangent modulus method and the applicability of the elastic constraint method are also analyzed and compared. The results show that in the deformation In the smaller case, the anisotropic tangent modulus method can better predict the tensile and cyclic hardening properties of the composite material. The isotropic tangent modulus method and the secant modulus method are more suitable for unidirectional Stretch prediction, while the elastic constraint method is high forecast.