论文部分内容阅读
面对科学技术的强权,科学技术批判理论执着于“机会”与“威胁”的不同批判立场,在科学的道德评价上陷入二难抉择的困境;海德格尔拒绝道德理性,企图通过技术的形而上学批判而消解科学的强权,此做法也行不通。现代科技并不能回避道德的审视,但是,现代科技问题的悬而未决性质,决定了科学伦理学必须做出方法论上的转向。赫费认为,恢复判断力的德性地位,实现对科学问题的准确诊断,能够克服现代科技强权的二难困境,这在方法论上构成了对科学技术批判理论的批判。
In the face of the power of science and technology, the critical theory of science and technology is clinging to different critical positions of “opportunity” and “threat”, and is in a dilemma of scientific moral evaluation; Heidegger rejects moral rationality and attempts It is not feasible to dispel the power of science through metaphysical criticism of technology. Modern science and technology can not avoid moral examination. However, the unsolved nature of modern science and technology determines that scientific ethics must make a methodological turn. Hoefe argues that the restoration of the moral status of judgment, the accurate diagnosis of scientific problems and the dilemma of overcoming the power of modern science and technology constitute a critique of the critical theory of science and technology in methodology.