论文部分内容阅读
在过去半个世纪里,美国印第安文学的性质和功用问题始终是美国学界最具争议性的理论问题之一,它涉及部落传统与文学典律、土著文学批评的政治语境以及世界主义与民族主义的抉择三个基本面向,这些可从克鲁帕特与沃里亚旷日持久的争论中见出一斑。由于这些面向都与文化的边际性和边界性有关,因此这场争论可以说是当今民族主义与世界主义之争的一个缩影,认真地审视这场论争将有助于澄清美国印第安文学创作和批评的一些关键性问题,把脉土著文学研究策略的变化、视点的转移和未来走向。
In the past half century, the issue of the nature and utility of American Indian literature has always been one of the most controversial theoretical issues in the American academic community. It involves tribal traditions and literary laws, the political context of indigenous literary criticism, and cosmopolitanism and ethnicity Three basic orientations of the choice of doctrine can be seen in the protracted debate between Klutat and Waliya. Since these aspects are all related to the marginalization and borderline of the culture, this debate can be said to be a miniature of the dispute between nationalism and cosmopolitanism today. A careful examination of this debate will help clarify the creation and criticism of American Indian literature Some of the key issues, the pulse of indigenous literature research strategy changes, the transfer of perspective and the future direction.