论文部分内容阅读
目的比较腹腔镜手术和传统开腹手术治疗子宫肌瘤的临床疗效。方法选择2010年1月~2013年10月2在本院接受治疗的100例子宫肌瘤患者为研究对象,平均分成两组,实验组与对照组,各50例,对照组患者给予传统开腹手术治疗,实验组实施腹腔镜手术治疗,比较两组患者的临床疗效和术后并发症情况。结果实验组患者在手术时间、出血量、排气时间、住院时间、术后并发症发生率等方面均较对照组有明显降低,两组比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论子宫肌瘤患者实施腹腔镜手术治疗能够显著减少手术时间、出血量、住院时间等,患者疼痛小、术后恢复快,且术后并发症发生较少,临床疗效显著,较传统开腹手术具有明显的优势,值得在临床上推广。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparotomy in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Methods 100 cases of uterine fibroids treated in our hospital from January 2010 to October 2013 were divided into two groups, experimental group and control group, 50 cases in each group. The control group was given conventional laparotomy Surgical treatment, the experimental group laparoscopic surgery, the clinical efficacy and postoperative complications in two groups were compared. Results Compared with the control group, the experimental group had significantly lower operative time, bleeding volume, exhaust time, hospitalization time and the incidence of postoperative complications. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The implementation of laparoscopic surgery in patients with uterine fibroids can significantly reduce the operation time, bleeding, hospitalization time, patients with small pain, quick recovery, and less postoperative complications, clinical efficacy significantly more than the traditional open surgery Has obvious advantages, it is worth in the clinical promotion.