西安市九十中学周世忠同志: 编辑同志经过研究,嘱我解答您在来函中提出的问题,谨复如次: 关于《史记》定名的时间,如你所说,各种工具书的提法很不一致。据我所知,史学家对这个问题的考证结论也是存在分歧的。杨明照先生在1939年《燕京学报》第26期发表过一篇《太史公书称史记考》,提供了这方面的详细情况。我认为,学者们的说法都有相当的根据,但又都有可商讨之处。如果你有兴趣,可以 Comrade Zhou Shizhong, a member of Xi’an Ninety High School: After studying and asking me to answer the questions you raised in your letter, I wish to elaborate on the following points: As you said, the reference to various types of reference books is very Inconsistent. As far as I know, historians also disagree on the textual conclusions of this issue. Mr. Yang Mingzhao published an article titled “Records of the History of Taishi History Calligraphy” in the 26th issue of the Yanjing Journal in 1939, providing details of this. In my opinion, the scholars have very good arguments, but all have discussions. If you are interested, you can