论文部分内容阅读
一、问题的提出根据《反不正当竞争法》(以下简称《反法》)第三条第二款规定,工商行政管理部门对不正当竞争行为行使监督检查权,“法律、行政法规规定由其他部门监督检查的,依照其规定。”对这一例外规定的理解和适用是《反法》实施20年来一直争议不断的难题。以保险行业为例,不同行政机关,所持观点并不相同。保监会认为,保险行业内发生的不正当竞争行为的执法主体是保监会。原因在于《保险法》规定,保险公司应当遵循公平竞争的原则,不得从事不正当竞争,保监会负责对保险业实施监督管理。而国家工商总局的答复认为,工商部
I. Issues raised According to Article 3, Paragraph 2 of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (hereinafter referred to as “Anti-Unfair Competition”), the administration for industry and commerce exercises the right of supervision and inspection on acts of unfair competition, and “the provisions of laws and administrative regulations Supervision and inspection by other departments shall be in accordance with its provisions. ”Understanding and application of this exception is an ongoing controversy over the past two decades of“ anti-law ”implementation. Take the insurance industry as an example. Different administrative bodies hold different views. CIRC believes that the law enforcement body of unfair competition in the insurance industry is the China Insurance Regulatory Commission. The reason is that the “Insurance Law” stipulates that insurance companies should follow the principle of fair competition, shall not engage in unfair competition, the Insurance Regulatory Commission is responsible for supervision and management of the insurance industry. The SAIC’s reply that the Ministry of Commerce