论文部分内容阅读
目的了解我国生物医学期刊在线投稿与审稿系统(OSPRS)的建设、使用情况,并比较不同 OSPRS 间的优劣。方法选择被 SCI 收录的生物医学期刊和《中文核心期刊要目总览(2004年)》医药卫生类期刊(中文核心期刊),通过 Google获取每种期刊的网络地址后,分别登录其网站,对有 OSPRS 的,进行模拟投稿,以比较各系统间的优劣。结果共纳入4种SCI 收录期刊和222种中文核心期刊,4种 SCI 收录期刊均建有 OSPRS,仅58种中文核心期刊建有 OSPRS,分属三个不同的系统,绝大多数(50种)使用的是 Magtech 稿件远程处理系统。国内、外 OSPRS 之间存在一定的差异。结论 OSPRS 在我国仅被少数医学期刊采用,虽在使用中暴露出一定的问题,但在某些方面已显示出其优越性。
Objective To understand the construction and use of the online submission and review system (OSPRS) of biomedical journals in China and to compare the advantages and disadvantages of different OSPRS. Methods The biomedical journals and the “Journals of Chinese Core Journals (2004)”, the journals of Chinese medicine and health (Chinese core journals), which were collected by SCI, were selected. After obtaining the network address of each journal through Google, OSPRS, to simulate the submission to compare the pros and cons between the various systems. Results A total of 4 SCI journals and 222 Chinese core journals were included. OSPRS were included in all 4 SCI journals and OSPRS was established in 58 Chinese core journals, belonging to three different systems. The vast majority (50 species) The Magtech manuscript remover is used. There are some differences between OSPRS at home and abroad. Conclusion OSPRS is only used in a few medical journals in our country. Although some problems have been exposed in the use of OSPRS, it has shown its superiority in some aspects.