论文部分内容阅读
目的:探析临床对重症哮喘合并呼吸衰竭患者在制定治疗方案时选择及不同治疗措施临床效果。方法:纳入于近年来本院收治确诊重症哮喘呼吸衰竭患者80例为本次研究对象,随机抽取40例接受常规对症治疗方案患者设为A组,另40例均接受常规联合无创正压通气治疗方案患者设为B组。比较不同治疗方案对严重哮喘呼吸衰竭患者的影响。结果:对各组患者分别在治疗前、治疗后进行各项动脉血气分析指标,显示接受治疗后患者指标均有所改善,观察组改善更具优越性(P<0.05)。结论:对严重哮喘呼吸衰竭患者在治疗过程中联合无创正压通气方案能够更短时间内改善临床症状,保障抢救成功率以及治疗后生活质量,值得普及推广。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of selecting and different treatment measures in the treatment of patients with severe asthma and respiratory failure. Methods: Totally 80 cases of patients with severe asthma respiratory failure admitted to our hospital in recent years were selected as the study object. Forty patients undergoing routine symptomatic treatment were enrolled as A group randomly. The other 40 patients underwent routine combined noninvasive positive pressure ventilation Program patients set to B group. The effects of different treatment regimens on severe asthmatic patients with respiratory failure were compared. Results: The indexes of arterial blood gas analysis before and after treatment showed that the patients’ indexes improved after treatment and the improvement in observation group was more superior (P <0.05). Conclusion: The combination of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with severe asthma respiratory failure can improve the clinical symptoms in less time, ensure the success rate of rescue and the quality of life after treatment, which is worth popularizing.