论文部分内容阅读
目的：探究临床检验分析前质量对检验结果的影响。方法选取经我院诊断治疗的120例患者，并将其分为观察组与对照组，给予观察组严格、规范检验分析前质量控制，对照组采用日常工作模式，比较两组检验效果，及患者对检验效果的满意度。结果观察组患者满意度、检验结果正确率均明显高于对照组，且组间差异有统计学意义。结论规范性操作是临床检验分析前质量提升的保证；临床检验分析前质量保证是提升检验正确率的前提。“,”objective:To explore the clinical quality inspection prior to the analysis of test results.Method:Selected by our hospital diagnosis and treatment of 120 patients, and divided into observation group and control group, giving observation group, strict inspection before analysis quality control, the control group adopted routine work mode, compared two groups of test results, and patient satisfaction of inspection results. Results:Observation group of patients satisfaction, inspection results accuracy were significantly higher than that of control group, and the difference between groups was statistical y significant.Conclusion:Normative operation is the guarantee of clinical inspection prior to the analysis of quality improvement; Clinical inspection prior to the analysis of quality assurance is the premise to improve inspection rate of correct.